BOTs

ecancer 2013, 7:379 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2013.379 Epithelial tumours of the ovary can be either benign (cystadenomas) or malignant (cystadenocarcinomas). However, there is an intermediate state of epithelial tumours of the ovary called ‘borderline tumours’. Neither the oncological behaviour of this intermediate group of tumours nor the histological changes of the cells of the ovarian epithelium meet the specific... Continue Reading →

The Naming Debate: to BOT or not?

The Naming Debate results in such confusion.  BOTs or *insert name of choice* seem to have failed any attempt at standard naming.  The Atlantic Ocean appears to offer a fault line between the major Naming Debate Contenders.  In an uninformed nutshell, it appears that the Anglo-side prefer BOT - borderline ovarian tumour - which emphasises tumour, whilst... Continue Reading →

Video that I have just come across (thank you Nicky!) explaining a histologist’s view of a borderline ovarian tumour.  (He starts with a reminder of Madonna’s hit, Borderline, obviously).(Source: https://www.youtube.com/)

Staging of BOTs

Staging and grading assists in determining treatment plans moving forward.  It is only at this point that the difference between OC and a BOT will be determined.This happens post-operatively as the tumour and anything else removed  - e.g. ovary/ovaries, fallopian tube/s, uterus, omentum, fluid from your abdominal cavity - will be analysed under the microscope.... Continue Reading →

BOTs are APOTs.

Given the confusion that I already have, imagine my delight at discovering yet another acronym:  APOT.  Apparently, this is an Atypical Proliferative Ovarian Tumour; otherwise known as BOT (so, they’re the same thing). At least the piece where I discovered APOTs clearly indicates exactly what my consultant emphasised: At the present time, the use of the... Continue Reading →

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑